E-mail List Archives
Re: breadcrumb navigation
From: Tim Beadle
Date: Nov 26, 2004 6:58AM
- Next message: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Next message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- View all messages in this Thread
"michael.brockington" wrote on
26/11/2004 13:19:01:
> It doesn't look like you read the article yourself - the images are
being
> used to instead of the natural element borders, thus replacing a
structural
> element, ie the border.
Huh? "Natural element borders"? Whether the visual effect is a "real" CSS
border, or an image, is irrelevant! Both are stylistic elements and are
therefore completely seperate from the *structure* of the document!
> In that example this was probably justifiable to
> create the required effect, but here what the author wants is a border -
> replacing a border with an image is wrong. Wrong! Always!
In your opinion. But if we want a web that is structurally and
semantically sound under the hood (markup) but visually attractive on top
(CSS), then we need techniques like this.
Tim
Institute of Physics
Registered charity No. 293851
76 Portland Place, London, W1B 1NT, England
IOP Publishing Limited
Registered in England under Registration No 467514.
Registered Office: Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol BS1 6BE England
This e-mail message has been checked for the presence of computer viruses.
- Next message: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Previous message: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Next message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- Previous message in Thread: michael.brockington: "Re: breadcrumb navigation"
- View all messages in this Thread