WebAIM - Web Accessibility In Mind

E-mail List Archives

Re: Check Images

for

From: mburks952
Date: Jan 20, 2005 2:55PM



Yes,

I think a proposal is a good idea. Shoot there are a lot of other words I
can't spell besides cheque.... Centre for one....

LOL

I can t think of anything either, but that is why we have this forum, yes?



So a whole lot of people smarter than I am can help! Especially those who
can spell cheque and other words...

As for the ATM issue, I will see what I can find out. As for the excessive
expense I think it is called "undue burden" Any Lawyers in the house?

Sincerely,

Mike Burks

-----Original Message-----
From: michael.brockington [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:57 AM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Check Images



> -----Original Message-----
> From: mburks952 [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ]
> Sent: 19 January 2005 14:23
> Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Check Images
>
>
> In the US there is a thing called the check 21 law which has
> gotten rid of checks effectively. Also check images
> apparently are going to come up on Automatic Teller
> Machines(ATMs).

Could you expand a little on that for those of us on the other side of the
pond?


> So it is going to be an issue.

Then we need to come up with some proposals - I can't think of anything
reasonable at the moment, but then I am making quite a habit of proving how
thick I am on public forums. Still, at least I can remain smug that at least
I know how to spell 'cheque'.


> And believe
> me, few employers will make adjustments for an employee if
> they can avoid it at least in my experience. They will say,
> "we have no blind employees" To me that is like saying " we
> don't need ramps we have no customers in wheel chairs."

I think in this case they will be far quicker to claim 'unreasonable'. (UK
law includes the phrase 'reasonable adjustments' as the basis for
discrimination. [Side Note: If, indeed they have no blind employees, then
there is no legal requirement for accessibility to blind users, for internal
applications.] Therefore if the only way to allow a user to carry out a task
involves _excessive_ expense, time etc then the requirement is also void)

For clarification, does a similar clause apply in the US?


>
> Stay tuned when and if I find out about the ATMs I will post it here.
>
Thanks, all information greatfully received.
Mike


********************************************************************

This email may contain information which is privileged or confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient of this email, please notify the sender
immediately and delete it without reading, copying, storing, forwarding or
disclosing its contents to any other person
Thank you

Check us out at http://www.bt.com/consulting

********************************************************************

----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/

----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/