E-mail List Archives
RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)
From: Malcolm Wotton
Date: Jan 11, 2006 10:40AM
- Next message: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "RE: Question on monitoring Section 508 compliance"
- Previous message: L: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Next message in Thread: Sarah Horton: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: L: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread
> > Patrick H. Lauke said
> Did I say *my* website? I'm advocating a feature that will work
> on *all* sites, and that's the point...
Sounds like you care more about getting browser developers to change their
software than the visitors to your site. I'm willing to break every design
guideline, recommendation, and contradict every expert if it benefits the
users of the site - that's who the site is created for. Now I agree the
design guidance is generally good, and experts are generally . . . well
expert. So they're worth listening to, but overall I'd rather have visitors
(and positive visitor feedback) than compliance any day.
>
> Same thing applied to browsers: being able to say "the most user
> friendly browser".
This means nothing, it only matters if the user population changes to
another browser. I know that's beginning with firefox, but in the end unless
users object and switch browser the companies developing browsers won't sit
up and take notice.
Malcolm
- Next message: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC: "RE: Question on monitoring Section 508 compliance"
- Previous message: L: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Next message in Thread: Sarah Horton: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- Previous message in Thread: L: "RE: Font Resizers (WAS RE: back to top)"
- View all messages in this Thread