E-mail List Archives
Re: skip to content, where and how many?
From: Mark Rew
Date: Mar 1, 2002 6:40AM
- Next message: rob: "Re: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Previous message: Tim Harshbarger: "RE: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Next message in Thread: rob: "Re: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Previous message in Thread: Tim Harshbarger: "RE: skip to content, where and how many?"
- View all messages in this Thread
Leo,
These are good questions, and will help your site to be accessible to screen
readers.
I'm not sure if I'm following the first part of your question. Usually I try
to have the first "skip to content" take the screen reader to a heading. If
the graphic your are skipping is in a <div> element you could put the anchor
immediately after the </div> tag.
I like the second "navigational skip link" idea. This would be useful for
screen readers that do not have the feature of skipping to the first
non-anchor text from the current pc cursor.
Consider using access keys for a quick means for the screen reader to get to
the skip navigational links.
thanks
Mark Rew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leo Smith" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
To: "WebAIM forum" < <EMAIL REMOVED> >
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: skip to content, where and how many?
> Can I ask folks' opinions on acceptable anchors that the "skip nav"
> link on a page should go to. Would it be acceptable to have the link
> go to an anchor that is wrapped around a transparent gif, the gif
> being located right before the main content.
>
> The reason I ask is that I am trying to develop templates for folks to
> use on our campus, but want to make sure that the anchors are
> somewhere in the code that folks do not edit. If I place it around an
> <h1> or <h2> tag right at the beginning of the main content, then it
> might get deleted as people will be editing that part.
>
> So I guess my question is, does the anchor have to be right where
> the "meat" of the content begins, or would immediately before,
> around a transparent gif, be OK. Would this be confusing to a non-
> visual user who might expect to arrive right at the main content
> when they follow that link?
>
> Also, what do people think about having two skip navigation links
> on a page - one at the top for the repetitive header navigation, and
> one further into the page that would skip a long list of links located
> on the right of the page, jumping down to the content after this list
> of links (not back upto the first main content section, as that
> wouldn't make any sense, as the user would have already
> encountered that part of the page).
>
> Any suggestions would be very much appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Leo.
>
> Leo Smith
> Web Designer/Developer
> USM Office of Publications and Marketing
> University of Southern Maine
> 207-780-4774
>
>
> ---
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>
> ----
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
> visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
>
>
----
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or view list archives,
visit http://www.webaim.org/discussion/
- Next message: rob: "Re: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Previous message: Tim Harshbarger: "RE: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Next message in Thread: rob: "Re: skip to content, where and how many?"
- Previous message in Thread: Tim Harshbarger: "RE: skip to content, where and how many?"
- View all messages in this Thread