E-mail List Archives
Re: Screen reader spelling conventions
From: John E. Brandt
Date: Oct 22, 2009 8:15AM
- Next message: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Guidelines for nested data tables?"
- Next message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- Previous message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- View all messages in this Thread
Just had a conversation last week with my friend Steve who is a screen
reader user and this topic came up. He indicated he didn't care about the
spelling or how the screen reader pronounced, or mispronounced word, just as
long as it did so consistently.
Interesting point, I thought.
~j
John E. Brandt
Accessible Web Design, Development, Consultation
Augusta, Maine USA
www.jebswebs.com
<EMAIL REMOVED>
207-622-7937
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED>
[mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Steven Henderson
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 3:55 AM
To: 'WebAIM Discussion List'
Subject: [WebAIM] Screen reader spelling conventions
I've become interested in ensuring that certain spellings are accessible to
screen reader users, so far I have changed a few conventions and wondered
what others thought and possibly suggestions of other words that I might
not yet have thought of (I expect there could be a few, given that I am only
suggesting two here).
"Sitemap" in favour for "Site map"
"Email" in favour for "E-mail"
And in any such cases, if search engine queries were in favour of the least
favoured spelling, how would that affect keywords (being that they're
sensitive).
Regards,
Steven
- Next message: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- Previous message: Jon Gunderson: "Re: Guidelines for nested data tables?"
- Next message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- Previous message in Thread: Steven Henderson: "Re: Screen reader spelling conventions"
- View all messages in this Thread