E-mail List Archives
Re: WebAIM] Page verses document
From: Corbett, James
Date: Nov 1, 2012 1:15PM
- Next message: David Farough: "Re: are these modal popups screen reader accessible ?"
- Previous message: Angela French: "Re: are these modal popups screen reader accessible ?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Corbett, James: "Re: Page verses document"
- View all messages in this Thread
Jared:
Could you elaborate, I have Google 'd until I was blue in the face and really couldn't nail anything down in relationship to your statement and the WCAG 2.0 AA recommendation.
Many thanks in advance,
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: <EMAIL REMOVED> [mailto: <EMAIL REMOVED> ] On Behalf Of Jared Smith
Sent: October 26, 2012 12:36 PM
To: WebAIM Discussion List
Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Page verses document
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Corbett, James wrote:
> Would the same WCAG criteria apply to this document?
If it is "web content", then WCAG would apply. If it is a txt file,
then it would only be necessary to implement the accessibility
requirements that are possible in that particular format.
Jared
- Next message: David Farough: "Re: are these modal popups screen reader accessible ?"
- Previous message: Angela French: "Re: are these modal popups screen reader accessible ?"
- Next message in Thread: None
- Previous message in Thread: Corbett, James: "Re: Page verses document"
- View all messages in this Thread